Antitrust Class Actions Class Certifications First Circuit Decisions Jurisdiction
November 6, 2018 / January 12, 2023 by Don Frederico
In his October 17th post, Josh Dunlap describes in detail the First Circuit’s landmark ruling in In re Asacol Antitrust Litigation concerning classes that include uninjured members. As Josh points out, although the district court had referred to ascertainability in its decision certifying the class, the First Circuit opinion reversing class certification did not, and for good reason. […]
Read more »
Tagged
Class Certifications Employment Class Actions US District Court - Mass
July 18, 2017 / January 12, 2023 by Don Frederico
In Romulus v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., five former Shift Supervisors brought a putative class action against CVS under the Massachusetts Wage Act, contending they were required to work through their unpaid breaks. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that they were required to remain in the store during their breaks when they were the only managerial employees […]
Class Certifications Consumer Class Actions
January 26, 2017 / May 17, 2024 by Katherine Kayatta
On this blog, we have previously written about the growing split among the federal circuits concerning courts’ approaches to ascertainability. The Third Circuit, in a string of cases within the last five years, adopted a test requiring that class members must be identifiable without extensive and individualized fact-finding or “mini-trials,” and a plaintiff must present […]
Class Certifications Third Circuit Decisions
October 11, 2016 / February 26, 2019 by PAMarketing
One of the least disputed elements of class certification is Rule 23(a)(1) numerosity, and so there is relatively little analysis from the courts about it. Last month, however, a divided panel of the Third Circuit provided a detailed analysis of the purposes of numerosity and the factors that district courts should employ in making numerosity […]
Class Certifications Supreme Court
January 16, 2016 / February 26, 2019 by mindgrub
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Microsoft Xbox case to decide whether federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction to review orders denying class certification after named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their individual claims with prejudice.
October 2, 2015 / February 26, 2019 by mindgrub
Last week, the District of Massachusetts denied class certification in a building products case in which Pierce Atwood represented the seller of a composite decking product. You can find a brief summary of the decision here.
Class Certifications
August 13, 2015 / January 11, 2023 by mindgrub
It has been a busy summer for federal appellate courts deciding class action issues. Amidst all the sound and fury, this summer's decisions so far highlight two splits among the federal circuits, while also diminishing if not eliminating a third split on an issue that is currently before SCOTUS. Here is a brief summary of the ebbs and flows.
August 6, 2015 / January 11, 2023 by mindgrub
The Seventh Circuit's July 28th decision in Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC has already created quite a stir.
April 27, 2015 / January 11, 2023 by mindgrub
Recently, I had the privilege of moderating a panel in Boston discussing hot topics in class actions. We had a terrific group of panelists, including three (besides myself) who represent defendants in class actions and one who represents plaintiffs. This imbalance was attributable to the nature of the organization sponsoring the program as a business-oriented legal foundation.
Class Certifications Current Affairs Supreme Court
March 27, 2015 / February 26, 2019 by mindgrub
This week the Supreme Court resolved a split among federal appellate courts over whether a statement of opinion in a company’s registration statement can be actionable under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 if the speaker actually holds the stated opinion. The high court ruled that such opinions are not actionable as an “untrue statement of material fact” simply because they turn out to be wrong. But, taking another “midway position” on a divisive issue of securities class action litigation, the court left the door open...
